Jump to content

Talk:Harry Potter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHarry Potter has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHarry Potter is the main article in the Harry Potter novels series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 27, 2025Good article nomineeListed
October 7, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
January 23, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
June 29, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 1, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 28, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
March 8, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
April 13, 2008Good article nomineeListed
August 2, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
September 22, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
October 4, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 18, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
May 16, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 18, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
August 17, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 26, 2022.
Current status: Good article

Making the second paragraph more specific

[edit]

I'm still learning the ropes so I'm sorry if this suggestion isn't appropriate.

I was reading the second paragraph and I thought that 'Major themes in the series include prejudice, corruption, madness, and death.' could be changed to 'Major themes in the series include prejudice, corruption, madness, and the acceptance of death.' I feel that this would reflect on the themes of the series, namely death, in a more specific way. SI Hari Singh Puttar (talk) 19:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

an alternative source would need to be provided for that 216.164.249.213 (talk) 17:22, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sapphina Marvelo Riddle

[edit]

She’s actually Voldemort’s daughter and was found in the 4th book. You will see they describe her with black and white hair. Sapphina is one out of two of Bellatrix and Voldemort’s daughter. Delphini Delphi is her older sister. Saphhy (talk) 03:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Criticism of Harry Potter has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 14 § Criticism of Harry Potter until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 11:43, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Canonical URL

[edit]

Strugglehouse (talk · contribs) changed the harrypotter.com URL in the infobox from "https://www.harrypotter.com/" to "https://harrypotter.com" saying Removing unnecessary "www." from website URL. After being reverted by me with the edit summary "www" is not unnecessary: the canonical URL is "https://www.harrypotter.com/", they reverted me, with the edit summary Absolutely no point in having this if the URL resolves without it.

If you check the web page source, you will see that the canonical URL contains "www", and it is common practice among webmasters and search engines to use the canonical URL and not some other URL that redirects to it (the name does resolve, but the web server has to redirect). So, imo, Strugglehouse's change is unnecessary – pointless, even – and incorrect. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 10:15, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Esowteric I disagree. The "www." is only needed if the website doesn't work without it. It adds unnecessary clutter to the infobox and looks less appealing. Multiple infobox documentation, including Template:Infobox company and Template:Infobox station, states "Do not include the leading www. unless the URL will not resolve without it." Therefore, it is completely unnecessary to include it unless required for the URL to function. Strugglehouse (talk) 10:28, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Well, if that's what the guidance says, then you're correct. Thanks. It's just that it creates work for the web server and the browser. Eg from an Apache virtualhost or .htaccess file, it may require a 301 redirect:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.(.*)$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%1/$1 [R=301,L]
Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 11:18, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Esowteric I understand. Thanks. I'm just following what guidance says and what seems to work best. Strugglehouse (talk) 11:27, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]